Jerry Bao
I know a young man named McNair
who's so fat that his clothes always tear.
When he left Nice
to travel to Greece,
he found he was already there!
Reyna Lu
I once knew a dog who could moo
and it seemed that was all it could do.
Until one day
I heard it say:
"Why hello there, how are you?"
Sunni Zhou
I have a friend named Sunni
she had a lot of money
she wanted a pet
and knew a vet
so she ended up buying a bunny.
Matthew Lysenko
There once was a man named Dane
who skydived off a plane.
Then he realized: oh, shoot,
I forgot my parachu--
and all that was left was a stain.
William Ting
There once was a little maid
who swallowed a can of Raid.
The can got stuck
she was out of luck
and she blew up like a grenade.
Caryn Qian
There was a statue in Barrie
That everyone thought was scary
with a carved fang,
a head that would hang
and eyes made of cherries.
This blog is a place where students of Olympiads School in Toronto can publish their writing: articles and stories. A place where they can read what their peers are writing. Ages 10-15.
Monday, 6 January 2014
Tuesday, 8 October 2013
Combating the Floods
By:
Gina Yang
Writing Grade 9-10
“We’re struggling to keep things like the TTC up and running and hospitals up and running,” Haines said on CP24 in Toronto. The July 8, 2013 storm ranks as the most costly natural disaster in the province's history, resulting in over 850 million dollars in property damage, according to CBC news. Despite this, not much effort has been made to deal with the infrastructural problems that led to the extensive flooding that caused the bulk of the damage.
Although some question the effectiveness of sewage and drainage system upgrades, believing that they'll only serve to increase the already enormous debt held by the city, they can help to alleviate future flood damage as well as improve the functionality of the city during intense storms. ImprovingToronto ’s drainage and sewage system
infrastructure would prevent home and road flooding, resulting in lower water
damage costs as well as smoother transportation in the city.
Although some question the effectiveness of sewage and drainage system upgrades, believing that they'll only serve to increase the already enormous debt held by the city, they can help to alleviate future flood damage as well as improve the functionality of the city during intense storms. Improving
The record
breaking downfall of rain caused major sewerage lines to be backed up which
resulted in thousands of flooded basements. By July 26, 2013, about 4500
calls had been made to Toronto Water regarding flooded basements.
“Tanya Morgado, who commutes fromMississauga , Ont., to downtown
Toronto , chose
to focus on her flooded basement instead of trying to make her way into work. When
the 25-year-old got home on Monday night, she ran downstairs — in the dark due
to a loss of power — to find muddy water seeping in and rising at an alarming
rate. At its highest point, Morgado estimated about 45 centimetres of water
covered her carpeted basement floors, rising higher than the electric sockets
in the walls.” – National Post.
Currently, according to the Huffington Post, insurers warned that consumer’s insurance bill may rise due to the 850 million dollars in damage as a consequence, strengthening the sewerage system would save people lots of money seeing that home damage would be reduced.
“Tanya Morgado, who commutes from
Currently, according to the Huffington Post, insurers warned that consumer’s insurance bill may rise due to the 850 million dollars in damage as a consequence, strengthening the sewerage system would save people lots of money seeing that home damage would be reduced.
The intense
flooding caused by the storm resulted in the closure of many roads and
highways, including the Don Valley
Parkway . In addition, approximately 1400 GO
transit passengers were stuck in the trains for seven hours before being
rescued. Moreover, sinkholes were created from the heavy downpour, creating
further complications for travelling. CBC news reports that it could cost 8
million dollars for a city to repair all its sinkholes from flooding.
Therefore, fixing sewers would not only save money in the future, but it will
save people time on their commute and ensure their safety in intense storms.
Although there
are numerous solutions, the most straightforward and effective choice would be
to simply bring back underground rivers. These underground rivers are designed
to relieve stress on the drainage in times on high water traffic. Yet, this
idea is outdated and clearly cannot manage the heavy precipitation as shown from
July 2013.
Michael Cook, a graduate student in landscape architecture at theUniversity
of Toronto who has been
exploring sewer systems around the GTA for the past decade, is championing an idea
to ease the strain on the storm sewer system: prevent rain from entering the
sewers in the first place. “One way to do this,” he said, “is to restore buried
rivers and creeks, a practice known as ‘daylighting’ that is gaining traction
in cities around the world.”- The Globe and Mail. Daylighting will not only help
to alleviate stress from the sewage and drainage systems, it will also make Toronto a more
environmentally friendly city. This system has also been demonstrated to work
in other major cities around the world. When the city of Seoul spent 384 million dollars to restored
six kilometres of the Cheonggyecheon stream, air and noise pollution were
reduced and birds, fish and insect came back to the area.
Michael Cook, a graduate student in landscape architecture at the
Spending over 900 million dollars to improve Toronto ’s infrastructure, specifically
focusing on drainage and sewage systems would be ideal to Torontonians. Using
the money to repair the city and to introduce daylighting would reduce home and
road damage in future storms. Commuting during storms will be more efficient,
not as many basements would be affected by flooding and the city will become
more eco-friendly. Overall, this investment will strengthen Toronto for the future.
Wednesday, 18 September 2013
The Next Step in Human Evolution
by Daniel Qi Writing grade 9-10 class
Every one in six thousand five hundred babies are born with a
serious mitochondrial disorder. This common issue, a DNA defect in the
mitochondria (which causes many chronic diseases), can be solved through genetic
engineering. Human genetic engineering is the key to the future of human
evolution as children can be genetically engineered to save siblings from fatal
diseases, modified to be more intelligent and have stronger immune systems, and
most importantly, family related illnesses such as mitochondrial defects can be
eliminated.
There are babies who are referred to as the "saviour
sibling". These are children who are genetically engineered to provide
matching tissues to help cure an elder sibling who is ill. For instance, Zain
Hashmi, a six-year-old boy with a fatal genetic blood disorder, who's only
chance is a bone marrow transplant from a common blood type sibling. His mother's
eggs were tested to find one that is suitable to save Zain. His new baby
brother saved Zain's life and his parents were grateful. Not all cases however have
a happy ending. Many people argue about the ethical issues of "saviour
siblings". On the other hand, the pros of this type of genetic
modification out weighs the cons. Many fatal and chronic diseases can be
greatly slowed or cured entirely.
Even healthy children can benefit from this technology through the
testing of the mother's eggs for the best child. Many diseases can be screened not
to happen in the first place, in a process called IVF-ET (In Vitro
Fertilization and Embryo Transfer). Parents can select a child that will not
contract a family related illness such as heart disease. Children may be
selected for physical traits such as eye or hair colour. The most important
idea is that children can be selected to have a strong immunity to disease and
become very intelligent. Every parent wants the best for their child and this
would allow them to give their child a more happy life. Some people say it's
not safe to allow the practice right now and they are right. Selective traits are
practiced on animals to make sure there would be no issues later in humans.
One type of genetic engineering already proven to be possible is the mitochondrial transfer. This practice essentially allows for a three parent child, where the mother's defective mitochondrial DNA is replaced with DNA from a donor. In late April of this year, it was confirmed that the team at the Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Science of St. Barnabas has successfully produced 30 babies through this process. These transfers allow the parents to avoid passing these genetic defects to their child. Common mitochondrial diseases may cause diabetes, degeneration of nerves, or even blindness. Once the cause of the disease is found to be a mitochondrial genetic disorder it's too late, the child would have to live with the disease forever as the DNA is locked in their cells.
This process has been tested to work on macaque monkeys; in 2009, Dr. Mitalipov and his researchers took eggs from two different populations (one from India, another from China). They transferred a foreign nucleus to the egg. The experiment's results were ground breaking; the infant monkeys were completely healthy even with DNA from two different populations of monkeys. "The monkey model is useful in understanding the early embryonic development, where the monkey can stand in for the human," says DR. Behringer a geneticist at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Although yet to be proven to work with humans, it will most likely work in the near future.
In the end, genetic defects plague the human population and this is the best solution for now. Genetic engineering is important to our evolutionary future, the fatal diseases we have can be cured and future generations can be genetically modified to be superior to humans today. The world is a harsh place and humans are far from perfect. With genetic defects that are fatal, our best solution is staring us in the face. Our technology is now almost to the point where we can control the course of our evolution, so why should we pass on a chance to improve ourselves?
Friday, 13 September 2013
Single-Sex Education: an Improvement?
By: Linda Wu
writing Grade 9-10
"Rigorous educational research has found that, contrary to popular belief, single-sex education does not produce better achievement outcomes compared to coeducation," writes Rebecca Bigler and Lise Eliot, authors of The Pseudoscience of Single-Sex Schooling. Also, while a child's education may be one of single-sex, the world he or she will continue in would not be. Knowing that, it is essential to have these teamwork skills between sexes developed at a young age; in a coeducational environment. Although single-sex schools in America are popular, it can do more harm than good, creating a lack of communication which can undermine potential partnerships with the opposite sex in a work environment, while establishing very little differences in learning styles between both genders, and promoting gender stereotypes.
Growing up in a single-sex environment at school, where most relationships with people are established, will not exercise healthy interactions between sexes needed in the real world. "Single-sex education reduces boys’ and girls’ opportunities to work together and learn from each other. These integrated interactions are known to be the most effective method for improving relations among groups of people. Girls may help boys learn better self control; boys may coax greater energy and challenge out of girls," writes R. S Bigler and L. S Liben on the American Council for Coeducational Schooling website. Even though some believe that students in a single-sex environment learn better without distractions from the opposite sex, this has not actually been proven true, according to Tim Barribeau's article at io9.com. Basically, students will have to learn how to work with the opposite sex sooner or later in life, and it would be agreeable to first practice that skill at a young age.
Realistically, the learning styles between both genders vary only slightly. Although one of the many reasons parents enroll their child in a single-sex school is because boys and girls learn differently, a study conducted in 2007 by the National Institute of Mental Health states that they found very little difference between the male and female adolescent brain when it came to learning styles. With this information, it is apparent that coeducation will be as beneficial to a specific gender's learning style just as single-sex education.
Finally, single-sex education reinforces gender stereotypes. A recent study from the University of Chicago Urban Education Institute concludes that: “Evidence is more clear that sex segregation increases gender stereotyping and legitimizes institutionalized sexism." Fundamentally, this is saying that since students are working in an environment without the presence of the opposite sex, stereotypes can easily flourish without the students experiencing what the opposite sex is really like firsthand. In 2011, a research conducted at Arizona State University showed that when boys and girls spend time apart, they do not learn from each other and negative stereotypes are reinforced. This can be proven by Lynn Liben's research, showing that when both genders are separated for two weeks, students "played less with children of the opposite sex and held traditional stereotypical gender views."
In conclusion, coeducation is more beneficial to a student's learning and growth because it exposes students to all kinds of experiences with the opposite sex, such as working together on a project and developing friendships, rather than shielding them from social skills they will need later to succeed in life. Even though these schools are now more popular, they do create a barrier of communication between sexes which may lead to a lack of communication which can conflict future partnerships in the work area with the opposite sex, while establishing very little differences in learning styles between both genders, and reinforcing gender stereotypes. Put simply: “Men and women have to get along. They need practice doing this and a co-ed education allows them to practice this.” - Chris Blake.
Monday, 9 September 2013
All about Face-to-Face Communication
Writing grade 9-10 class
On a brisk afternoon, Sharon exchanged text messages with her daughter who left home for three years and was studying in college. They chatted back and forth, and her daughter replied with positive statements followed by a big smile and a heart. Sharon was glad that her daughter seemed to be living happily alone. Her daughter committed suicide later that night. It came to light that Sharon’s daughter had been showing signs of depression for a long time.
This story tells us about the lack of reality in electronic communication. Moreover, social media has led the younger generation today to ignore face-to-face communication causing them to be deficient of interpersonal communication skills. In order for youths not to be face-to-face communication outcasts, they are encouraged to go outside and interact because face-to face communication prevents misunderstandings of messages, creates more immediacy of the conversation and enhances the building of a strong relationship.
This story tells us about the lack of reality in electronic communication. Moreover, social media has led the younger generation today to ignore face-to-face communication causing them to be deficient of interpersonal communication skills. In order for youths not to be face-to-face communication outcasts, they are encouraged to go outside and interact because face-to face communication prevents misunderstandings of messages, creates more immediacy of the conversation and enhances the building of a strong relationship.
To begin with, although electronic communication saves the time for setting up a meeting, messages will possibly be misunderstood between exchanging texts. Dr. Albert Mehrabian, author of Silent Messages, found that only 7% of day to day communication is based on written or verbal word, the other 93% is based on nonverbal body language. Indeed, nonverbal communications such as tone, facial expression or body language convey the message in a greater meaning than verbal expression does. When people are face to face, they can observe each other’s reactions. For example, when observing someone who frequently checks his or her watch or averts eye contact, we can infer that he or she is impatient. In addition, back and forth texts sending may be confusing when someone is trying to make a decision.
Cognitive psychologist Fred Conrad says that people are more likely to disclose sensitive information via text messages than through face-to-face communication. Certainly, responses through electronic communication may not be genuine; what is written on the text might be very different from what the sender is truly feeling. It is only when we can hear a tone of voice or see eye contact that we can decide whether the person means it or not. Therefore, with face-to-face communication, the message is less likely to be misinterpreted.
Cognitive psychologist Fred Conrad says that people are more likely to disclose sensitive information via text messages than through face-to-face communication. Certainly, responses through electronic communication may not be genuine; what is written on the text might be very different from what the sender is truly feeling. It is only when we can hear a tone of voice or see eye contact that we can decide whether the person means it or not. Therefore, with face-to-face communication, the message is less likely to be misinterpreted.
Furthermore, face-to-face communication makes the action of giving and receiving messages happen right away. A study from Kaiser Family Foundation found out that teenagers from eight to eighteen spend more than ten hours a day on average using social media. Surely, emails and texts can take from a few seconds to a few minutes to be received and the conversation can be dragged on and on. Compared to the face-to-face communication, the effect happens at once—speakers speak, listeners listen and react. The give-and-receive process does not require any waiting time and the results come out immediately.
On the other hand, too many exchanges of text are not as efficient as face-to-face communication. Conversation can be carried on swiftly through face-to-face communication and any doubt regarding the topic can be resolved immediately. Also, while two people are texting online, they might be replying to the message and also doing other tasks, thus taking time to reply. Therefore, face-to-face communication saves people lots of time to have an efficient conversation.
On the other hand, too many exchanges of text are not as efficient as face-to-face communication. Conversation can be carried on swiftly through face-to-face communication and any doubt regarding the topic can be resolved immediately. Also, while two people are texting online, they might be replying to the message and also doing other tasks, thus taking time to reply. Therefore, face-to-face communication saves people lots of time to have an efficient conversation.
Eventually, face-to-face communication can build a stronger bond between people. With someone who we already have an established relationship, an email of greetings will be sufficient; but for someone we meet for the first time, a meeting in person is necessary to establish a lasting relationship. The reason for a face-to-face communication to have a great effect on establishing relationships is the personal touch. Personal touch gives an impression of warmth and caring between personal bonds. DePauw University psychologist Matthew says, "With the face and voice, in general we can identify just one or two positive signals that are not confused with each other, but it seems instead that touch is a much more nuanced, sophisticated, and precise way to communicate emotions."
This research also shows that touch can communicate multiple emotions, like joy, love, gratitude and sympathy. Meeting the person face to face gives the chance for a personal touch and the foundation of credibility can be built through a warm handshake/hug. " A limp handshake signifies uncertainty, low enthusiasm, introversion, while a vise-like grip can be taken as a sign that we're trying to dominate. We want to have a firm but not bone-crushing handshake," San Diego State University School of Communication professor Peter Andersen advises. In addition, people feel more connected to someone if they receive personal touch. Therefore, the personal touch plays a powerful role in face-to-face communication.
In brief, the younger generation should be expected to go out and interact face-to-face. Face-to-face communication is more effective than electronic communication in interpretation, immediacy and the establishment of a relationship. How the nonverbal cues can influence a conversation makes face-to-face communication an essential form of communication. Gerald Stark, vice president of education and product development at The Fillauer Companies Inc. said, “There’s a lot we can do with phone and email, but so much of the message or meaning gets lost. It’s important to meet the person in their own context because context really defines what they’re relating to. When we miss that with different kinds of communication instruments, we miss out on some of that meaningful communication.”
People should try to change their habit of electronic communicating so they will not neglect nonverbal information that complements the message. Also, changing their habit of communication will also give people a more satisfying relationship which in return makes them significantly happier.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)